<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Features Should We Add?</title>
	<link>http://www.jblogsphere.com/blog/2006/08/15/what-features-should-we-add/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 10:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: SephardiLady</title>
		<link>http://www.jblogsphere.com/blog/2006/08/15/what-features-should-we-add/#comment-68</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 03:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jblogsphere.com/blog/2006/08/15/what-features-should-we-add/#comment-68</guid>
					<description>Maybe you could add a search feature so people can search for certain topics among the blogs.  JRants has this, but I like your sight better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you could add a search feature so people can search for certain topics among the blogs.  JRants has this, but I like your sight better.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Great site!</title>
		<link>http://www.jblogsphere.com/blog/2006/08/15/what-features-should-we-add/#comment-33</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jblogsphere.com/blog/2006/08/15/what-features-should-we-add/#comment-33</guid>
					<description>Hey, I just found this site two minutes ago, and I really like the concept.  The problem is that among "over 200 sites" there are a lot of worthless ones.  I don't care to read what every idiot says, I just want the best of the jblogosphere.  But how can I distinuish the good from the bad?  I don't think you need to get into reviews, but some sort of hierarchy is in order.  I think something along the lines of http://truthlaidbear.com/ecosystem.php would be great.  The busiest sites, in terms of traffic, links to, trackbacks, or whatever, would make a better listing than your current listing, which is only alphabetical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I just found this site two minutes ago, and I really like the concept.  The problem is that among &#8220;over 200 sites&#8221; there are a lot of worthless ones.  I don&#8217;t care to read what every idiot says, I just want the best of the jblogosphere.  But how can I distinuish the good from the bad?  I don&#8217;t think you need to get into reviews, but some sort of hierarchy is in order.  I think something along the lines of <a href="http://truthlaidbear.com/ecosystem.php" rel="nofollow">http://truthlaidbear.com/ecosystem.php</a> would be great.  The busiest sites, in terms of traffic, links to, trackbacks, or whatever, would make a better listing than your current listing, which is only alphabetical.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
